Categories
How to Cite
Copyright notice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Timothy P. Mayotte, Rafid Q. Farjo, Krystal D. Kao, Harrison Wong, Christopher Nagata, Paul Salow, Shahzad I. Mian, K. Thiran Jayasundera
Keywords
Abstract
Purpose: To identify the most influential drivers shaping the field of ophthalmology and develop expert-derived, consensus-driven future scenarios.
Design: A mixed-methods study.
Methods: A modified Delphi process was performed to develop and build expert consensus on future scenarios within ophthalmology. Initial faculty surveys were used to identify critical drivers in the field. Focus groups with key opinion leaders (KOLs) in the United States were conducted to discuss implications of these drivers within the field in the context of “aspirational”, “conventional”, and “bleak” state scenarios. Focus groups and surveys were qualitatively analyzed using grounded theory principles of coding to develop the future scenarios. Drafted scenarios were then sent back to KOLs for feedback to achieve consensus.
Results: Twenty-seven faculty responded to an initial survey, identifying five key drivers: artificial intelligence in eye care, health policy and financial reform, physician shortages, the aging population, and research funding. Thirty-one experts participated in five focus groups, yielding 276 coded quotations. Discussion centered most heavily on artificial intelligence (AI) and least on aging. Across all drivers, 51% of coded data reflected conventional projections, 30% aspirational, and 19% bleak. Aspirational futures emphasized whole-person preventive care, AI integration with proper safeguards, equitable workforce distribution, enhanced advocacy for research, and improved care access utilizing assistive technologies. Conversely, bleak futures involved drastic funding cuts, regulatory misalignment in AI, worsening physician shortages, and system overload from demographic pressures.
Conclusion: Scenario planning reveals that ophthalmology’s trajectory depends on proactive strategies to strengthen research advocacy, adopt population-based care models, optimize the workforce, and ensure responsible AI implementation.
References
Porter LF, Black GC. Personalized ophthalmology. Clin Genet. 2014 Jul;86(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12389
Li JO, Liu H, Ting DSJ, et al. Digital technology, tele-medicine and artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: A global perspective. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021 May;82:100900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100900
U.S. Census Bureau. (2025, February 12). 2023 National Population Projections Tables: Main Series. U.S. Department of Commerce. Available from: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2023/demo/popproj/2023-summary-tables.html
GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2023 Jul 15;402(10397):203-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01301-6
Irodi A, Zhu Z, Grzybowski A, et al. The evolution of diabetic retinopathy screening. Eye (Lond). 2025 Apr;39(6):1040-1046. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03633-4
Teo ZL, Tham YC, Yu M, et al. Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Projection of Burden through 2045: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2021 Nov;128(11):1580-1591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.04.027
Berkowitz ST, Finn AP, Parikh R, Kuriyan AE, Patel S. Ophthalmology Workforce Projections in the United States, 2020 to 2035. Ophthalmology. 2024 Feb;131(2):133-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.09.018
Institute for Alternative Futures. Public Health 2030: A Scenario Exploration. Alexandria, VA. May 2014. Available from: https://kresge.org/sites/default/files/Institute-for-Alternative-Futures-Public-Health-2030.pdf
GBD 2021 US Burden of Disease and Forecasting Collaborators. Burden of disease scenarios by state in the USA, 2022-50: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024 Dec 7;404(10469):2341-2370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02246-3
Potts S, Hoekzema GS, Cagno CK, Anthony E. Shaping GME Through Scenario-Based Strategic Planning: The Future of Family Medicine Residency Training. J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Aug;14(4):499-504. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-22-00505.1
Enzmann DR, Beauchamp NJ Jr, Norbash A. Scenario planning. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011 Mar;8(3):175-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.08.022
Priebe S, Arenas Borrero Á, Bird V, et al. Possibilities for the future of global mental health: a scenario planning approach. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 11;19(1):392. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2381-3
Vollset SE, Goren E, Yuan CW, et al. Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1285-1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30677-2
Knopp MI, Warm EJ, Weber D, et al. AI-Enabled Medical Education: Threads of Change, Promising Futures, and Risky Realities Across Four Potential Future Worlds. JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Dec 25;9:e50373. https://doi.org/10.2196/50373
Neth M, Mattsson A, I’Ons D, et al. A collaborative planning process to develop future scenarios for wastewater systems. J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 15;316:115202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115202
Daiy K, Arslanian K, Choy C, et al. Consensus-building during the Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly (BBF) initiative in Samoa: A qualitative content analysis. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Apr 24;3(4):e0001725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001725
Liu M, Kadakia KT, Patel VR, Krumholz HM. Characterization of Research Grant Terminations at the National Institutes of Health. JAMA. 2025 Aug 12;334(6):534-536. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.7707
Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget. (2025, May 2). Fiscal year 2026 discretionary budget request. The White House. Available from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Fiscal-Year-2026-Discretionary-Budget-Request.pdf
National Alliance for Eye and Vision Research. Friends of the NEI FY26 Appropriations Sign-On Letter. Washington (DC): National Alliance for Eye and Vision Research; 2025 May. Available from: https://www.eyeresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/NAEVR_Friends-of-NEI-FY26-Appropriations-Sign-On-Letter_FINAL-Sent.pdf
Sonmez B, Makarovs K, Allum N. Public perception of scientists: Experimental evidence on the role of sociodemographic, partisan, and professional characteristics. PLoS One. 2023 Jul 7;18(7):e0287572. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287572
Critchley CR. Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers. Public Underst Sci. 2008 Jul;17(3):309-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070162
National Science Board, National Science Foundation. 2024. Science and Technology: Public Perceptions, Awareness, and Information Sources. Science and Engineering Indicators 2024. NSB-2024-4. Alexandria, VA. Available from: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20244.
Scott AW, Bressler NM, Ffolkes S, Wittenborn JS, Jorkasky J. Public Attitudes About Eye and Vision Health. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(10):1111–1118. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.2627
Cologna V, Mede NG, Berger S, et al. Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries. Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Apr;9(4):713-730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5
Varma R, Vajaranant TS, Burkemper B, et al. Visual Impairment and Blindness in Adults in the United States: Demographic and Geographic Variations From 2015 to 2050. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(7):802–809. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1284
Ehrlich JR, Ndukwe T, Solway E, et al. Self-reported Eye Care Use Among US Adults Aged 50 to 80 Years. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(9):1061–1066. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.1927
Carey NL, DuPuis DT, Lin G, et al. Glaucoma Patient Perspectives on Effective Coaching for Self-Management. J Glaucoma. 2025 May 20. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002593
Schneider KJ, Hollenhorst CN, Valicevic AN, et al. Impact of the Support, Educate, Empower Personalized Glaucoma Coaching Program Pilot Study on Eye Drop Instillation Technique and Self-Efficacy. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021 Jan-Feb;4(1):42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2020.08.003
Davis TS, Luo F, Xie SJ, Muro-Fuentes EA, Rodrigues EB. Evaluating Adherence to Diabetic Retinopathy Care in an Urban Ophthalmology Clinic Utilizing the Compliance With Annual Diabetic Eye Exams Survey. Cureus. 2023 Jan 23;15(1):e34083. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34083
Obermeyer, Z., Nissan, R., Stern, M. Algorithmic bias playbook. Center for Applied Artificial Intelligence, University of Chicago Booth: 2021. Available from: https://www.chicagobooth.edu/-/media/project/chicago-booth/centers/caai/docs/algorithmic-bias-playbook-june-2021.pdf
Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342
Leslie D, Mazumder A, Peppin A, Wolters MK, Hagerty A. Does “AI” stand for augmenting inequality in the era of covid-19 healthcare? BMJ. 2021 Mar 15;372:n304. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n304
Lim JI, Regillo CD, Sadda SR, et al. Artificial Intelligence Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy: Subgroup Comparison of the EyeArt System with Ophthalmologists’ Dilated Examinations. Ophthalmol Sci. 2022 Sep 30;3(1):100228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2022.100228
Abramoff MD, Whitestone N, Patnaik JL, et al. Autonomous artificial intelligence increases real-world specialist clinic productivity in a cluster-randomized trial. NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Oct 4;6(1):184. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00931-7
Rajkomar A, Hardt M, Howell MD, Corrado G, Chin MH. Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning to Advance Health Equity. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 18;169(12):866-872. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-1990
Goodman SN, Goel S, Cullen MR. Machine Learning, Health Disparities, and Causal Reasoning. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 18;169(12):883-884. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-3297
Wolf RM, Liu TYA, Thomas C, et al. The SEE Study: Safety, Efficacy, and Equity of Implementing Autonomous Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Youth. Diabetes Care. 2021 Mar;44(3):781-787. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-1671
Wolf RM, Channa R, Abramoff MD, Lehmann HP. Cost-effectiveness of Autonomous Point-of-Care Diabetic Retinopathy Screening for Pediatric Patients With Diabetes. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 1;138(10):1063-1069. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.3190
U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (2021, January). Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML) Based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) Action Plan (U.S. FDA Center for Devices & Radiological Health). Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/145022/download
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2019, April 2). Proposed regulatory framework for modifications to artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML)-based software as a medical device (SaMD) – Discussion paper and request for feedback. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/122535/download
Blumenkranz MS, Tarver ME, Myung D, Eydelman MB; Collaborative Community on Ophthalmic Imaging Executive Committee. The Collaborative Community on Ophthalmic Imaging: Accelerating Global Innovation and Clinical Utility. Ophthalmology. 2022 Feb;129(2):e9-e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.10.001
Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology. (2025, April). 2025 Ophthalmology Residency Match summary report. Available from: https://sfmatch.org/files/afbcdc36aed-644caa28a41cf544f7b0b
Kent C. Managing the upcoming provider shortage. Rev Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 14. Available from: https://www.reviewofophthalmology.com/article/managing-the-upcoming-provider-shortage
SB1451 | Tennessee 2023-2024 | Physicians and Surgeons - As enacted, revises the law relative to the board of medical examiners issuing a temporary license of limited duration to certain international medical school graduates. - Amends TCA Title 63. | TrackBill
Federation of State Medical Boards. States with Enacted and Proposed Additional IMG Licensure Pathways: Key Issue Chart. August 2025. Available from: https://www.fsmb.org/siteassets/advocacy/policies/states-with-enacted-and-proposed-additional-img-licensure-pathways-key-issue-chart.pdf