How to Cite
Copyright notice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sarah Tajran, Anjali Ferris, Justin Flood , Roshni Vasaiwala
Keywords
Abstract
Purpose: Ophthalmology, though fundamental, is often sidelined in modern medical curricula—despite its complex anatomy and the looming shortage of ophthalmologists. To reimagine how students engage with this vital field, we developed and evaluated an immersive, peer-led virtual reality (VR) simulation lab designed to enhance first-year medical students’ understanding, confidence, and enthusiasm for ophthalmology at Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine.
Methods: Forty-two first-year students participated in a 1-hour session combining foundational didactics with experiential learning at 3 interactive VR stations. These featured the OcuSim app via Oculus headsets, stereoscopic EyeSim modules, and the iBench 3D ZSpace platform. Guided by senior students and residents, participants
explored ocular anatomy, pathology, and neurovisual pathways in an immersive format. Pre- and post-session surveys and assessments captured changes in confidence, knowledge, and clinical reasoning. Statistical analysis utilized Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar chi-square tests.
Results: The intervention yielded marked improvements across cognitive and affective domains. Confidence in labeling ocular anatomy rose from a mean of 2.7 to 3.5 (p < 0.01), and visual pathway comprehension improved from 2.3 to 3.3 (p < 0.01). Objective assessments confirmed gains in anatomical labeling and interpretation of neuro-ophthalmic deficits, including cranial nerve III palsies and Meyer’s loop lesions. Notably, 100% of students answered cranial nerve III-related questions correctly post-intervention, up from 78.6%. Feedback highlighted the lab’s novelty, relevance, and its capacity to make complex content intuitive and engaging.
Conclusion: This student-led VR simulation lab transcends traditional teaching by blending clinical relevance with cutting-edge interactivity. It significantly boosts anatomical comprehension, clinical reasoning, and learner confidence—while igniting interest in an underserved specialty. As immersive technology becomes more accessible, this model offers a scalable blueprint for transforming medical education with impact and innovation.
References
Haowen J, Vimalesvaran S, Myint Kyaw B, Tudor Car L. Virtual reality in medical students’ education: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2021 May 26;11(5):e046986. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046986
Oh YB, Kim GW, Han KS, et al. Efficacy of Virtual Reality Combined With Real Instrument Training for Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(8):1400-1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.03.013
Ong CW, Tan MCJ, Lam M, Koh VTC. Applications of Extended Reality in Ophthalmology: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 19;23(8):e24152. https://doi.org/10.2196/24152
Karbasi Z, Niakan Kalhori SR. Application and evaluation of virtual technologies for anatomy education to medical students: A review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:163. Published 2020 Dec 3. https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.34.163
Uruthiralingam U, Rea PM. Augmented and Virtual Reality in Anatomical Education - A Systematic Review. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1235:89-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37639-0_5
Lee R, Raison N, Lau WY, et al. A systematic review of simulation-based training tools for technical and non-technical skills in ophthalmology. Eye. 2020 Oct 13;34(10):1737-59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-0832-1
Ng DS, Yip BHK, Young AL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of virtual reality and wet laboratory cataract surgery simulation. Medicine. 2023 Oct 6;102(40):e35067. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035067
Mondal S, Kelkar AS, Singh R, Jayadev C, Saravanan VR, Kelkar JA. What do retina fellows-in-training think about the vitreoretinal surgical simulator: A multicenter survey. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;71(8):3064-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_381_23
Nguyen AAK, Tsui E, Smith JR. Social media and ophthalmology: A review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 May 12;50(4):449-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14091
Moxon NR, Goyal A, Giaconi JA, et al. The State of Ophthalmology Medical Student Education in the United States: An Update. Ophthalmology. 2020 Nov;127(11):1451-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.05.001
Kalina RE, Van Dyk HJ, Weinstein GW. Ophthalmology teaching in medical schools. Academic Medicine. 1981 Feb;56(2):143-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-198102000-00014
Shah M, Knoch D, Waxman E. The State of Ophthalmology Medical Student Education in the United States and Canada, 2012 through 2013. Ophthalmology. Jun 2014;121(6):1160-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.12.025
Higginbotham EJ. Assessing the Status of Ophthalmic Education 100 Years After the Flexner Report. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec 13;128(12):1600. https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.280
Quillen DA, Harper RA, Haik BG. Medical Student Education in Ophthalmology: Crisis and Opportunity. Ophthalmology. 2005 Nov;112(11):1867-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.005
Berkowitz ST, Finn AP, Parikh R, Kuriyan AE, Patel S. Ophthalmology Workforce Projections in the United States, 2020 to 2035. Ophthalmology. 2024 Feb;131(2):133-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.09.018
Branstetter BF, Faix LE, Humphrey AL, Schumann JB. Preclinical Medical Student Training in Radiology: The Effect of Early Exposure. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2007 Jan;188(1):W9-14. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.2139
Zuckerman SL, Mistry AM, Hanif R, et al. Neurosurgery Elective for Preclinical Medical Students: Early Exposure and Changing Attitudes. World Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;86:120-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.081
Wu EH, Fagan MJ, Reinert SE, Diaz JA. Self-Confidence in and Perceived Utility of the Physical Examination: A Comparison of Medical Students, Residents, and Faculty Internists. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov 16;22(12):1725-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0409-8
Mavis B. Self-efficacy and OSCE performance among second year medical students. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2001;6(2):93-102. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011404132508
Brown KE, Heise N, Eitel CM, et al. A Large-Scale, Multiplayer Virtual Reality Deployment: A Novel Approach to Distance Education in Human Anatomy. Med Sci Educ. 2023 Feb 16;33(2):409-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01751-w
Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016.
Vihos J, Chute A, Carlson S, Shah M, Buro K, Velupillai N. Virtual Reality Simulation in a Health Assessment Laboratory Course: A Mixed-methods Explanatory Study Examining Student Satisfaction and Self-confidence. Nurse Educ. 2024;49(6):E315-E320. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001635
Taysi AE, Taysi NM, Sismanoglu S. Evaluation of the efficacy of a simulation model used in oral and maxillofacial surgery education. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05307-3
Yu JH, Chang HJ, Kim SS, et al. Effects of high-fidelity simulation education on medical students’ anxiety and confidence. PloS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251078. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251078
Deuchler S, Dail YA, Koch F, et al. Efficacy of Simulator-Based Slit Lamp Training for Medical Students: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Aug 9;12(4):2171-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00733-w
Tso HL, Young J, Yung CW. Comparing Eyesi Virtual Reality Simulator and Traditional Teaching Methods for Direct Ophthalmoscopy: Students’ Perspectives at Indiana University School of Medicine. Journal of Academic Ophthalmology. 2021 Jan 27;13(01):e66-72. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726349