How to Cite
Copyright notice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sarah Tajran, Justin Flood, Anjali Ferris, Roshni Vasaiwala, Jhansi Raju, Donna Quinones
Keywords
Abstract
Purpose: This study explores the efficacy of a virtual reality (VR)-based simulation lab in enhancing foundational knowledge and clinical skills among PGY2 ophthalmology residents. It investigates VR’s role in improving anatomical understanding, diagnostic ability, and learner confidence at the beginning of ophthalmology residency.
Methods: A 4-hour experiential simulation lab was conducted at the Loyola University Chicago simulation center using Oculus VR headsets and zSpace stereoscopic displays. PGY2 residents from 5 Chicago-based ophthalmology programs participated in interactive glaucoma and retina modules focusing on ocular anatomy, iridocorneal angle understanding, cranial nerve function, aqueous flow, and pupil examination. Pre- and post-session surveys, knowledge assessments, and anatomical drawings were used to evaluate improvements in understanding and diagnostic skill. Statistical analysis was performed using the exact Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results: Fourteen of 18 invited residents (77.8%) participated. Significant improvement was observed in understanding the iridocorneal angle, aqueous flow, and pathology diagnosis on virtual patients (p < 0.05). Most participants (92.9%) reported enhanced understanding of anatomy and expressed high satisfaction with the training. The majority (85.7%) would recommend the training to peers, and 92.9% supported offering it to future residents.
Conclusion: The VR-based simulation lab significantly enhanced anatomical comprehension and examination skills among ophthalmology residents. The immersive nature of the experience fostered greater learner engagement and confidence. These findings support integrating VR into early ophthalmology education to standardize and improve foundational clinical training.
References
Lin JC, Yu Z, Scott IU, Greenberg PB. Virtual reality training for cataract surgery operating performance in ophthalmology trainees. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;12(12):CD014953. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014953.pub2
Lucas L, Schellini SA, Lottelli AC. Complications in the first 10 phacoemulsification cataract surgeries with and without prior simulator training. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2019;82(4). https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20190057
Belyea DA, Brown SE, Rajjoub LZ. Influence of surgery simulator training on ophthalmology resident phacoemulsification performance. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(10):1756-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.032
Winebrake JP, McMahon JF, Sun G. The utility of virtual reality simulation in cataract surgery training: a systematic review. J Acad Ophthalmol. 2020;12(2):e221-e233. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718555
Montrisuksirikun C, Trinavarat A, Atchaneeyasakul L. Effect of surgical simulation training on the complication rate of resident-performed phacoemulsification. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022;7:e000958. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000958
Saleh GM, Lamparter J, Sullivan PM, et al. The international forum of ophthalmic simulation: developing a virtual reality training curriculum for ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:789-92. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302764
Yang L, Al-Ani A, Bondok MS, Gooi P, Chung H. The impact of extended reality simulators on ophthalmic surgical training and performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17,623 eyes. Eye (Lond). 2025 Feb 28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03722-4
Thomas A, Redd T, Hwang T. Improving the transition to ophthalmology residency: a survey of first-year ophthalmology residents. J Clin Acad Ophthalmol. 2016;8(1):e10-e18. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1581109
Jiang H, Vimalesvaran S, Wang JK, Lim KB, Mogali SR, Car LT. Virtual reality in medical students’ education: scoping review. JMIR Med Educ. 2022;8(1):e34860. https://doi.org/10.2196/34860
Barteit S, Lanfermann L, Bärnighausen T, Neuhann F, Beiersmann C. Augmented, mixed, and virtual reality-based head-mounted devices for medical education: systematic review. JMIR Serious Games. 2021;9(3):e29080. https://doi.org/10.2196/29080
Uruthiralingam U, Rea PM. Augmented and virtual reality in anatomical education: a systematic review. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020:89-101. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37639-0_5 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37639-0_5
Ong CW, Tan MCJ, Lam M, Koh VTC. Applications of extended reality in ophthalmology: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(8):e24152. https://doi.org/10.2196/24152
Mergen M, Meyerheim M, Graf N. Reviewing the current state of virtual reality integration in medical education - a scoping review protocol. Syst Rev. 2023;12(1):97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02266-6
Waterston SW, Stewart IJ. Survey of clinicians’ attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students. Clin Anat. 2005;18(5):380-4. doi:10.1002/ca.20101 https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20101
McKeown PP, Heylings DJA, Stevenson M, McKelvey KJ, Nixon JR, McCluskey DR. The impact of curricular change on medical students’ knowledge of anatomy. Med Educ. 2003;37(11):954-61. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01670.x
Prince KJAH, Scherpbier AJJA, van Mameren H, Drukker J, van der Vleuten CPM. Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy? Med Educ. 2005;39(3):326-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02096.x
Kaufman D, Lee S. Formative evaluation of a multimedia CAL program in an ophthalmology clerkship. Med Teach. 1993;15(4):327-40. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599309006655